On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Jay Vaughan wrote:
> >keep in mind yamaha's announcement that they would be using linux in
> >most of their keyboards starting within a year or so.
>
> I heard about this announcement as a rumoure but haven't seen
> anything 'official' on it. However if
>>keep in mind yamaha's announcement that they would be using linux in
>>most of their keyboards starting within a year or so.
>
>I heard about this announcement as a rumoure but haven't seen
>anything 'official' on it. However if the mighty Paul Davis has
>heard it too, then there must be some
keep in mind yamaha's announcement that they would be using linux in
most of their keyboards starting within a year or so.
I heard about this announcement as a rumoure but haven't seen
anything 'official' on it. However if the mighty Paul Davis has
heard it too, then there must be some weight in
>Well, theres the chameleon (sp?), but that isn;t a card, so wont lett you
>accelerate just inner loops.
Its very nice, and it's rack mountable, which is a big plus.
I just have to say that the Chameleon is a rack-hackers tool of
choice and if any of you audio/Linux guys haven't had a chance to
Knowing that you know the APIs of Mac OS X too,
do you still see some things lacking in the current
Linux APIs ?
I think that the low-latency work being done in the kernel, the
latest LADSPA work, and Jack work by Paul D, pretty much levels the
playing field technology-wise. Same with driver des
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, CK wrote:
> I read:
> > Hi, I've been playing a lot with bristol synth and really love it. So
> > much so that I've been trying to 'Jackify' it. Actually, I'm pretty
>
> so ist there a jackified bristol anywhere to download ?
Reading that message I tried to get bristol running
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 06:58:03 -0700, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > The problem is not speed but latency glitches. It certainly should be
> > > slower than a "real" dual cpu system but it could be slightly faster
> > > than the same uniprocessor machine with ht turned off. Of course i
Good news yeah... sure...
When I read the title I was hoping for something like:
- Kernel 2.6 is tested reliably with 16-samples buffers... or something
similar... :-)
Oh well, I'll have to settle for the millions then...
/R
onsdagen den 4 juni 2003 05.17 skrev johnsonwilliams:
> Dear Sir,
Dear Sir,
I am BarristerJohnson Williams Solicitor,the
Personal Attorney to Mr Mark Dimitris a national of
your country, who used to work with shell
development company in Nigeria. On the 21st of April
1999, my client,his wife And their three children
were in volved in a car accident along Sagamu/
Dear Sir,
I am BarristerJohnson Williams Solicitor,the
Personal Attorney to Mr Mark Dimitris a national of
your country, who used to work with shell
development company in Nigeria. On the 21st of April
1999, my client,his wife And their three children
were in volved in a car accident along Sagamu/
> > The problem is not speed but latency glitches. It certainly should be
> > slower than a "real" dual cpu system but it could be slightly faster
> > than the same uniprocessor machine with ht turned off. Of course if you
> > have latency problems it is not very useful.
>
> I think its a better
Lukas Degener wrote:
MVC sure is a great thing, but I would like to see a concrete
toolkit or a hint list which helps me in making perfect MVC
code immediately. Is it even possible to write a MVC toolkit?
(...)
What would be in such a toolkit?
Depends on what the toolkit is ment to do. The mos
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:19:15 -0700, Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> The problem is not speed but latency glitches. It certainly should be
> slower than a "real" dual cpu system but it could be slightly faster
> than the same uniprocessor machine with ht turned off. Of course if you
> have
MVC sure is a great thing, but I would like to see a concrete
toolkit or a hint list which helps me in making perfect MVC
code immediately. Is it even possible to write a MVC toolkit?
(...)
What would be in such a toolkit?
Depends on what the toolkit is ment to do. The most consequent use of
m
> How does the P4 machine compare against itself with hyperthreading turned
> off?
The latency is fine (when booting into a up kernel). I did not run
generic benchmarks for testing speed. There is a gain but it is not that
much (from benchmarks I've seen on the web).
> I'm not surprised that hyp
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 06:44:08PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> MVC sure is a great thing, but I would like to see a concrete
> toolkit or a hint list which helps me in making perfect MVC
> code immediately. Is it even possible to write a MVC toolkit?
> What would be in such a toolkit?
GTK has
Hello. It is still quite unclear to me how I actually would code
the MVC type software. Can anyone give practical hints?
Practical examples taken from existing software would be fine
too.
What open source software uses MVC? Most open source software
seems to manipulate the model data in the GUI ro
17 matches
Mail list logo