On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 19:25, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
> > > attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plu
> > Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
> > How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
> > we are doing? Xine? Sodipodi? Others?
>
> I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one oscillator's
> frequency with the output of another os
Hallo,
Paul Winkler hat gesagt: // Paul Winkler wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one oscillator's
> > frequency with the output of another oscillator using more than about
> > 10 Hz because that is Frequency
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 12:51, Paul Winkler wrote:
> Sue every radio station in the world?
Then again, Major Armstrong did give RCA a hard time back in the 50s.
Slightly different baseband frequency range, though... :)
Cheers!
|
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 15:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> LilyPond version 2.0 was released today.
And I've only just finished compiling 1.8!
Chris
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> > discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
> > attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
> Does this mean that the decision process is dr
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> > discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
> > attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
> Does this mean that the decision process is dr
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:21:33PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
> > So, what happened to XAP?
>
> GMPI:
> http://aulos.calarts.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/2003-February/022272.html
>
> > Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
>On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
>> discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
>> attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
>Does this mean that the decision process is driven by commercial
>interests.
its driven by a desire to *avoid*
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 05:36:59PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Juhana Sadeharju hat gesagt: // Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
>
> > Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
> > How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
> > we are doin
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 07:44:43PM +0200, Marco Ballini wrote:
> So, what happened to XAP?
GMPI:
http://aulos.calarts.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/2003-February/022272.html
> Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
I think XAP has been put on hold. GMPI is a much more promising project,
th
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-wide
> attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that the decision process is driven by commercial
interests.
If yes, is there a place for an open API
>So, what happened to XAP?
>Is this list the right place for discussion on it?
>Would it be better to add my ideas to "XAP spec - early scribbles"
>(e-mail from Tim Hockin on 4 February 2003) or to put them in an
>indipendent form?
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI is an industry-w
I'm following the LADSPA and XAP discussions from the beginning.
I've some ideas about audio plugins I've been thinking about since 2001.
What I really wanted was an audio plugin API for:
- a music composition environment
- real-time music performances
All my ideas led to a sketch of an event-orien
Hallo,
Juhana Sadeharju hat gesagt: // Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
> How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
> we are doing? Xine? Sodipodi? Others?
I suppose you wouldn't be allowed to control one
Dear music enthousiasts,
LilyPond version 2.0 was released today. LilyPond is an automated
music notation system: it is used to make gorgeous sheet music. It is
libre software ("open source"), and available for most Unix flavors,
including Linux and MacOS X, and MS Windows.
Use it for your mu
> Juhana, would you happen to have any pointers to the media coverage on this?
> It's been a non-issue in the North American media.
http://swpat.ffii.org/
cheers
--
Tim Orford
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 05:59, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> They were more conserned about how companies'
> money escapes from research and development to the patent lawyers
> when companies *have to* start patenting. (It looks like professional
> politicians do not realize that nobody forces
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:59:32PM +0300, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> I would like to propose the following: if EU gets the software
> patents, then should non-profit open source community and non-profit
> academic researchers get patents for free. Then we would be in
> equally competitive situation.
directBOX Reply ---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24.09.2003 12:07:26
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine? S
Hello. Can anyone report what is going on with the EU software patents?
How they would affect immediately the audio and graphics development
we are doing? Xine? Sodipodi? Others?
Yesterday news broadcasting made not a big case how EU software
patents affects us. They were more conserned about how
21 matches
Mail list logo
