On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:27 pm, Hans Fugal wrote:
> As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
> use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
> with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
> into account?
Personally, I w
Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I apologizer if this has been discussed, but I haven't read the whole
> thread. Has the idea of a simple sched_rr helper been discussed?
Roger Larsson has an rt_monitor program that can do most of what you
suggest. It also limits the fraction of the CPU
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the clarification, I was getting confused... so the GTK
> problem only happens if you try to tag executables only for realtime
> access.
Right. GTK complains if its executable uses either setuid or setgid.
This is regrettabl
I apologizer if this has been discussed, but I haven't read the whole
thread. Has the idea of a simple sched_rr helper been discussed?
It can be setuid and only executable by a specific group.
rtsched my_rt_app
setscheduler
drop privs
exec
I guess that doesn't help mloc
> > The "sgid approach" is in addition to having a realtime group or
> > instead? I have the feeling I have missed something in the thread.
>
> The setgid approach *is* a match on the realtime group. The question
> is which of several group IDs to you actually match against. Torben's
> jackcaps
As in, how do I share my own? What licenses or other scheme do you all
use for music that you create and would like to be widely distributed,
with or without any other restrictions. What considerations do you take
into account?
disclaimer: I don't have any cool music to release (yet), although I h
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The "sgid approach" is in addition to having a realtime group or
> instead? I have the feeling I have missed something in the thread.
The setgid approach *is* a match on the realtime group. The question
is which of several group IDs to
> > > So, I modified Torben's LSM to check supplementary groups, and this
> > > seems to work fine. From a system admin perspective it's pretty good.
> > > I'm a member of group `audio', which was accomplished by adding my
> > > user ID (joq) to the appropriate entry in /etc/group...
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:13:48PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Jesper Anderson wrote:
> > GTK has been like that for years now. Check the archives of SLASH'EM,
> > a Nethack clone, for lots of back and forth. In short, they're not
> > going to change.
>
> D
On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 01:35, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> I've been experimenting with Torben's LSM for the 2.6 kernel, and the
> realtime group permissions mechanism we discussed.
>
> Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
> tolerate the use of setgid...
>
> (process:11
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:49:24AM +0100, Jesper Anderson wrote:
> GTK has been like that for years now. Check the archives of SLASH'EM,
> a Nethack clone, for lots of back and forth. In short, they're not
> going to change.
Do they have a valid reason? Or are they just imposing their paranoia on
Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution, then
> > the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't suppose the GTK
> > developers are likely to take the test out ju
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:38:55AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution,
> > then the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't
> > suppose the GTK developers are likely to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 05:12:50PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> If you accept my arguments why this is not the right solution, then
> the question remains, what to do about GTK-2? I don't suppose the GTK
> developers are likely to take the test out just because we ask them.
Have we tried? It seem
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:35:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
> > tolerate the use of setgid...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> hmm... perhaps we trick the binary by setting the gid back
> to the e_gid after enabling capabilit
I would be interested in this project too. What I'm looking for is
actuallay an anti-reverb that will be able to cancel reverbs in a
listening room, well always in conjunction with the listener position.
The other useful thing would be a phase-filter to correct the phases
coming out from a two or t
Hello,
I am looking for a deconvolver, that is able to produce impulse
responses from sinus sweeps (and especially the exponentially
sweeping sine wave introduced by Farina).
Do you have any suggestions or at least tips to start an
implementation by myself?
Recently I managed to use the mls t
On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 06:35:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
>
> I've been experimenting with Torben's LSM for the 2.6 kernel, and the
> realtime group permissions mechanism we discussed.
>
> Naturally, there are some problems. The worst is that GTK-2 will not
> tolerate the use of setgid...
uh
18 matches
Mail list logo
