Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 22:01:29 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Albert Graef) wrote: > What where the specific problems you encountered? I've never tried > wavelets for the purpose of spectrum estimation, so it would be very > kind if you could share your experiences. The results I obtained with wavelets

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: This floated by a month or so back: http://ab-initio.mit.edu/harminv/ Thanks, that looks like a viable alternative, I'll have a look at that. I have messed with wavelets (dyadic and the discrete approximation of continuous wavelets) and I always found that they never

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Prony algorithm?

2004-07-05 Thread Albert Graef
Niklas Werner wrote: You can play around with comparing LPC and FFT results at different settings by using my software :-) http://sonasound.sf.net/ Thanks, I'll try that, too. -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] W

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Charles de Martigny
--- Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 09:24, Michael Ost wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: > > > When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be > more > > > viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, it

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 09:24, Michael Ost wrote: > On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: > > When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be more > > viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, its not a > > generally viable platform for realtime audio. > > What so

Re: [linux-audio-dev] NPTL/2.6 (was snd-hdsp oddities)

2004-07-05 Thread Michael Ost
On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 19:16, Paul Davis wrote: > When the dust settles from the kernel and NPTL, 2.6 will be more > viable. Right now, even though it works for some people, its not a > generally viable platform for realtime audio. What sort of issues are you seeing with NPTL and the 2.6 kernel? Ar

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LSM 2004 music theme: July 8th/9th

2004-07-05 Thread Francois Dechelle
Le lun 05/07/2004 à 15:59, Frank NEUMANN a écrit : > Hi all, > Francois wrote: > > > The complete program is there: > > http://prog.lsm2004.abul.org/program/view_topic.php?topic_id=4&langnew=en > > To ask the obvious question here :-) - > will there be live audio broadcasts from this event? Would

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LSM 2004 music theme: July 8th/9th

2004-07-05 Thread Frank NEUMANN
Hi all, Francois wrote: > The complete program is there: > http://prog.lsm2004.abul.org/program/view_topic.php?topic_id=4&langnew=en To ask the obvious question here :-) - will there be live audio broadcasts from this event? Would be cool to attend such a meeting virtually myself for the first t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LSM 2004 music theme: July 8th/9th

2004-07-05 Thread Francois Dechelle
The complete program is there: http://prog.lsm2004.abul.org/program/view_topic.php?topic_id=4&langnew=en fd Le dim 04/07/2004 à 21:48, Paul Davis a écrit : > I thought it might worth mentioning 2 days of intense LAD-friendly > talks at the Libre Software Meeting on July 7th and 8th. The program >