Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel]2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt + alsa + jack = dead computer

2003-01-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano wrote: ... 4) schedule +1ab sleep_on +45 bread +20 __mark_inode_dirty +d9 pipe_write +1b9 poll_freewait +44 sys_write +9f system_call +33 So the system seems to be stuck in __mark_inode_dirty, whatever that is. No, that's just stack gunk. There's no

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel]2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt + alsa + jack = dead computer

2002-12-30 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
qjackconnect. I'm currently trying to see if I can start the stuff from the text console so that I can try to catch some register dumps through the sysrq magic key... I don't have the time now to analyze the results but it would seem the problem is freqtweak in combination with jackd.

Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel]2.4.20 + lowlat +preempt + alsa + jack = dead computer

2002-12-06 Thread Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
To add one more datapoint to the thread and (apparently good news): I'm testing 2.4.20 (final) + lowlat + preempt + acpi + alsa + jack and the computer seems to be chugging along nicely. This is with today's alsa. A slighly older alsa did lock the computer after 5 or so minutes of jack