On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, member graysky wrote:
> Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
There isn't even a stable, working, fixing btrfsck yet :)
> AFAIK, it currently does not work as such (i.e. `shutdown -rF now`
> does not trigger a check on the next boo
On 03/29/2012 10:01 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:44:38PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
>> We need to clean a VACANCY em(if we have) when we fail to start a
>> transaction.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
>> ---
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c |6 +++---
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 d
Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
AFAIK, it currently does not work as such (i.e. `shutdown -rF now`
does not trigger a check on the next boot). What is the recommended
method to check a btrfs root filesystem? Live media?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 04:39:29PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> Hello Josef,
>
> Josef Bacik wrote (ao):
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> > > I can't seem to balance my btrfs filesystem. It segfaults, and gives a
> > > kernel bug:
> > >
> > > [ 1355.139099] [ cu
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:14:22PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> > > After a reboot, I tried again, with the same result:
> > >
> > > [ 81.048767] [ cut here ]
> > > [ 81.053619] kernel BUG
Ilya Dryomov wrote (ao):
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> > After a reboot, I tried again, with the same result:
> >
> > [ 81.048767] [ cut here ]
> > [ 81.053619] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2733!
> > [ 81.053619] Internal error: Oops
Hi,
looks similar to what's been sent
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/15472/focus=16227
david
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/major
Hello Josef,
Josef Bacik wrote (ao):
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> > I can't seem to balance my btrfs filesystem. It segfaults, and gives a
> > kernel bug:
> >
> > [ 1355.139099] [ cut here ]
> > [ 1355.139099] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 02:44:38PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
> We need to clean a VACANCY em(if we have) when we fail to start a transaction.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c |6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/bt
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I can't seem to balance my btrfs filesystem. It segfaults, and gives a
> kernel bug:
>
> [ 1355.139099] [ cut here ]
> [ 1355.139099] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2733!
> [ 1355.149322] Internal e
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:52:35PM +0200, Sander wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I can't seem to balance my btrfs filesystem. It segfaults, and gives a
> kernel bug:
>
> [ 1355.139099] [ cut here ]
> [ 1355.139099] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2733!
> [ 1355.149322] Internal e
Hi Liubo
>Messaggio originale
>Da: liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
>Data: 29/03/2012 3.24
>> Could you elaborate which would be the issue ?
>> "cp --reflink"-ing a file is not different than snapshotting a file. In
>> any case I could mount a snapshot and not the source subvolume.
>>
>
>We alre
Hello all,
I can't seem to balance my btrfs filesystem. It segfaults, and gives a
kernel bug:
[ 1355.139099] [ cut here ]
[ 1355.139099] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2733!
[ 1355.149322] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] SMP
[ 1355.149322] Modules linked in:
[ 1355.15
13 matches
Mail list logo