Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: do not increment on bio_index one by one

2014-05-02 Thread David Sterba
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 01:07:58PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > 'bio_index' is just a index, it's really not necessary to do increment > one by one. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo Reviewed-by: David Sterba -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message t

[PATCH] Btrfs: do not increment on bio_index one by one

2014-04-28 Thread Liu Bo
'bio_index' is just a index, it's really not necessary to do increment one by one. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo --- fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c index 9d84658..344b89c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item