Excerpts from Li Zefan's message of 2011-05-03 05:11:44 -0400:
> Any comments? If this patch is acceptable, it should be queued for .39?
> since fs.h is exported to userspace.
>
> Li Zefan wrote:
> > FS_COW_FL and FS_NOCOW_FL were newly introduced to control per file
> > COW in btrfs, but FS_NOCOW_
Any comments? If this patch is acceptable, it should be queued for .39?
since fs.h is exported to userspace.
Li Zefan wrote:
> FS_COW_FL and FS_NOCOW_FL were newly introduced to control per file
> COW in btrfs, but FS_NOCOW_FL is sufficient.
>
> The fact is we don't have corresponding BTRFS_INODE
