On Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:39:14 +1100
NeilBrown wrote:
> > There is value in using the c:func syntax, as it will generate
> > cross-references to the kerneldoc comments for those functions. In this
> > case, it would appear that these comments exist, but nobody has pulled
> > them
On Sat, Jan 06 2018, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> There is value in using the c:func syntax, as it will generate
> cross-references to the kerneldoc comments for those functions. In this
> case, it would appear that these comments exist, but nobody has pulled
> them into the docs yet. I took the
On 01/06/18 12:20, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> I've been thinking about all the kernel-doc we have that's completely
> unincorporated. I've also been thinking about core-api/kernel-api.rst
> which to my mind is completely unreadable in its current form -- look at
>
On Sat, Jan 06, 2018 at 11:09:08AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:04:31 -0800
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > > +When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
> > > +is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:04:31 -0800
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > +When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
> > +is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for
> > +membership. In practice, this means ``groups_sort()`` should be
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 08:01:15AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> +When replacing the group list, the new list must be sorted before it
> +is added to the credential, as a binary search is used to test for
> +membership. In practice, this means ``groups_sort()`` should be
For a .rst file,