On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:06:59PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:02:09 -0500 "Theodore Ts'o" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > +int ext4_get_blocks_wrap(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, sector_t
> > block,
> > + unsigned long max_blocks, struct bu
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 10:49:05AM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 06:30:49PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> > Annoyingly this seems to be intermittent, and I have not managed to get
> > a machine into this state again yet. Will keep trying.
>
> Ok,
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 06:30:49PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Annoyingly this seems to be intermittent, and I have not managed to get
> a machine into this state again yet. Will keep trying.
Ok, I have been completly unsuccessful in reproducing this. Dispite
having two distinct ma
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> FS
>
> Subject : hanging ext3 dbench tests
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/176
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andy Whitcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cause
Annoyingly this seems to be intermittent, and I have not managed to get
a machine into this state again yet. Will keep trying.
-apw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/
I have a couple of failed test runs against 2.6.23-rc6 where the
job timed out while running dbench over ext3. Both on powerpc,
though both significantly different hardware setups. A failed
run like this implies that the machine was still responsive to
other processes but the dbench was making no
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:22 -0400
> Mingming Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> with the patch all headers are checked. the code should become
>> more resistant to on-disk corruptions. needless BUG_ON() have
>> been removed. please, review for inclusion.
>>
>> ...
>
>> @@
The next version of checkpatch.pl (0.08) should have support for a
number of the missed sylistics you mention. Will let them soak for a
bit to ensure we're not majorly regressing anything else.
-apw
ERROR: braces {} are not necessary for single statements
#4: FILE: Z11.c:1:
+if (EXT4_I(inode)->i
Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:39:06 -0700
>> Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Zach,
>>>
>>> While running IO tests I get following messages on 2.6.19-rc2-mm1
>>>
>>> BUG: warning at mm/truncate.c:400/
