On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Ian Kent wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>
> >
> > This new version has regressed since beta2 for /net mounts in my
> > environment. A simple ls of /net/ will now show the contents of
> > /net//exporteddir. So, for example, we have devfiler which exports
>
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> ==> Regarding [autofs] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Important update - autofs 4.1.4
> release; [EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
>
> raven> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Here is autofs 4.1.4.
>
> raven> There were a couple of mistakes in t
==> Regarding [autofs] Re: [ANNOUNCE] Important update - autofs 4.1.4 release;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] adds:
raven> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is autofs 4.1.4.
raven> There were a couple of mistakes in the release.
raven> The kernel patches have been updated a
> > > Yet, the results from stat() don't distinguish the number spaces,
> > > and "ls" doesn't map the numbers to names properly in the wrong
> > > space.
> >
> > Well you can use "ls -n". It's up to the tools to present the
> > information you want in the way you want it. If a tool can't do tha
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Yet, the results from stat() don't distinguish the number spaces,
> > and "ls" doesn't map the numbers to names properly in the wrong
> > space.
>
> Well you can use "ls -n". It's up to the tools to present the
> information you want in the way you want it. If a tool ca
> > I have a little project to imlement a "userloop" filesystem, which
> > works just like "mount -o loop", but you don't need root privs. This
> > is really simple to do with FUSE and UML.
>
> That would be a nice way to implement those rarely used old
> filesystems that aren't really needed in
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I have a little project to imlement a "userloop" filesystem, which
> works just like "mount -o loop", but you don't need root privs. This
> is really simple to do with FUSE and UML.
That would be a nice way to implement those rarely used old
filesystems that aren't really
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > Look up the rather large linux-kernel & linux-fsdevel thread "silent
> > semantic changes with reiser4" and it's followup threads, from last
> > year.
>
> Wow, it's 700+ messages. I got through the first 40, and already feel
> dizzy :)
It's easier if you skip the ones b
> Look up the rather large linux-kernel & linux-fsdevel thread "silent
> semantic changes with reiser4" and it's followup threads, from last
> year.
Wow, it's 700+ messages. I got through the first 40, and already feel
dizzy :)
> It's already been tried. You will also find sensible ideas on wha
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > Aren't there some assumptions in VFS that currently make this
> > > impossible?
> >
> > I believe it's OK with VFS, but applications would be confused to death.
> > Well, there really is one issue -- dentries have exactly one parent, so
> > what do you do when opening a
> > > A nice implemention of it in FUSE could push it along a bit :)
> >
> > Aren't there some assumptions in VFS that currently make this
> > impossible?
>
> I believe it's OK with VFS, but applications would be confused to death.
> Well, there really is one issue -- dentries have exactly one pa
> > Aren't there some assumptions in VFS that currently make this
> > impossible?
>
> I believe it's OK with VFS, but applications would be confused to death.
> Well, there really is one issue -- dentries have exactly one parent, so
> what do you do when opening a file with hardlinks as a director
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:14:10 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > There are uses for both. For example today I was updating the tar ball
> > > which is used to create the var file system for a new chroot. I
> > > certainly
> > > want to see corretly setup owner/permissions when I look into t
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 21:08:25 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > There was a thread a few months ago where file-as-directory was
> > discussed extensively, after Namesys implemented it. That's where the
> > conversation on detachable mount points originated AFAIR. It will
> > probably happen at
> > There are uses for both. For example today I was updating the tar ball
> > which is used to create the var file system for a new chroot. I certainly
> > want to see corretly setup owner/permissions when I look into that tar
> > ball using a FUSE fs...
>
> If I'm updating a var filesystem
On Wed, 2005-04-13 at 16:31, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> on den 13.04.2005 Klokka 16:03 (+1000) skreiv Greg Banks:
>
> > Any other issues?
> >
> > Greg.
>
> Well, I'm sa bit curious as to what "iap->ia_valid |= ATTR_NO_BLOCK"
> will do. AFAICS, there is nothing that actually tests for it.
fs/xfs/l
16 matches
Mail list logo
