Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Tuesday 06 September 2005 02:55, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:48, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you

Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Stacking support for inode_init_security

2005-09-06 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:47:12PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following patch changes the (new to -mm) inode_init_security function to support multiple LSMs. It does this by placing the three passed arguments (name, value, len) into a structure, and passing in a list_head, onto which

Re: GFS, what's remainingh

2005-09-06 Thread Alan Cox
On Maw, 2005-09-06 at 02:48 -0400, Daniel Phillips wrote: On Tuesday 06 September 2005 01:05, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: do you think it is a bit premature to dismiss something even without ever seeing the code? You told me you are using a dlm for a single-node application, is there anything

[PATCH 2.6.13] bfs: fix endianness, signedness; add trivial bugfix

2005-09-06 Thread Andrew Stribblehill
* Makes BFS code endianness-clean. * Fixes some signedness warnings. * Fixes a problem in fs/bfs/inode.c:164 where inodes not synced to disk don't get fully marked as clean. Here's how to reproduce it: # mount -o loop -t bfs /bfs.img /mnt # df -i /mnt FilesystemInodes IUsed