On Fri 26-10-07 00:49:41, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:07:36PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > This is overdue, sorry. Got a little complicated, and I've been away from
> > > my filesystem test setup so I didn't want ot send it (lucky, coz I found
> > > a bug after mo
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 09:07:36PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is overdue, sorry. Got a little complicated, and I've been away from
> > my filesystem test setup so I didn't want ot send it (lucky, coz I found
> > a bug after more substantial testing).
> >
> > Anyway, RFC?
> Hmm, m
Hi,
> This is overdue, sorry. Got a little complicated, and I've been away from
> my filesystem test setup so I didn't want ot send it (lucky, coz I found
> a bug after more substantial testing).
>
> Anyway, RFC?
Hmm, maybe one comment/question:
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
> =
Hi,
> This is overdue, sorry. Got a little complicated, and I've been away from
> my filesystem test setup so I didn't want ot send it (lucky, coz I found
> a bug after more substantial testing).
>
> Anyway, RFC?
A bit overdue review but since I haven't seen anybody else replying...
I've read
Hi,
This is overdue, sorry. Got a little complicated, and I've been away from
my filesystem test setup so I didn't want ot send it (lucky, coz I found
a bug after more substantial testing).
Anyway, RFC?
---
Implement nobh in new aops. This is a bit tricky.
FWIW, nobh_truncate is now implemented
