On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 19:51, Serge Dubrouski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing to learn about Pacemaker :-) It looks like it runs
monitor/status action for all configured resources before trying to
start any of those resources. Then modifying that init script is your
the only option.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 15:41, Thibaut Perrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why don't you put the samba and drbd resources in a resource group, as the
samba will always be launched AFTER the drbd resource and filesystem ?
because we also check the status of resources _before_ we start
anything
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 03:35, jijun gao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi, Andreas
very short interval and timeout
*Jul 31 16:24:37 node2 last message repeated 9 times
Jul 31 16:24:37 node2 setroubleshoot: SELinux is preventing ifconfig
(ifconfig_t) read write to socket:[136168] (initrc_t).
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 19:18, daniel peess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello andreas,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 11:04:10AM +0200, Andreas Kurz wrote:
Ok .. I see. Try to set the 'default-resource-stickiness' to a
positive value and give each of your groups a different 'priority'.
That should do
On 2008-07-31T16:44:31, Angel Rengifo Cancino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, it's because I'm first trying to understand very well heartbeat
1.x before learning 2.x style. Using haresources it seems easier for
my simple requirements.
That's not necessarily helpful, as v2 is very different, and
Thanks Lars and Michael:
The squid script from Centos 5.2 it wasn't working correctly when
trying to start twice. I edited /etc/init.d/squid a now start twice
always returns me code 0.
Now heartbeat doesn't give up when tries to start an already running
service. I'll check every init script
Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 08:55:53AM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
General Linux-HA mailing list linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:52:10PM -, root wrote:
Hi,
Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Brock Palen
Good, finally there's someone got the same things as me. I just don't
know if there's any chance the stonith/external would parse return
value 0 into 256, or ipmitool itself have bugs when doing reset.
Brock, can I ask your machine type and model? I met some non-zero
I did figure it out. Problem is some of the docs out there are not
very clear. I will blog this at www.mlds-networks.com If you need
this latter, or just look in the mailing list archives.
The format is
stonith_host HOST SENDING external/ipmi HOST TO CONTROL
So what I really needed:
