On 08/19/2013 03:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Hi,
Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
of the loop, I mean.
Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Th
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 08:57:02AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > > > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > >
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:11:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > > of the loop, I mean.
>
> Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch wit
Hi,
> > Which means your original patch starts to make a lot more sense. I
> > wonder is this is really what we should be doing though - breaking out
> > of the loop, I mean.
Yup, that is fine. I applied the old patch with Acks from Hein and
Felipe to -next. Thanks!
> It looks like TI's i2c-davi
Hi Grygorii, Filipe,
On 7/16/2013 9:00 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:08:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Felipe,
>> On 07/16/2013 02:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 02:01:11PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On a OMAP4460
Hi,
(when replying, can you add some blank lines around your reply and the
previous mail, it's quite difficult to find your replies with so many
quote marks (>) around)
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 03:08:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
> On 07/16/2013 02:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
Hi Felipe,
On 07/16/2013 02:27 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 02:01:11PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
The
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 02:01:11PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
>
> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
> SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
> The bus becomes _unusable for o
Hi Hein, Felipe
On 07/16/2013 12:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:33:47PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
On 7/16/2013 5:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
Hi Vikram,
On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
A driver (lm75) is
On 7/16/2013 5:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
>> Hi Vikram,
>>
>> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
>>
>> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
>> SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:33:47PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> On 7/16/2013 5:03 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> >> Hi Vikram,
> >>
> >> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
> >>
> >> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 04:19:35PM +0800, Hein Tibosch wrote:
> Hi Vikram,
>
> On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
>
> A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
> SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
> The bus becomes _unusable for other clie
Hi Vikram,
On a OMAP4460, i2c-bus-3:
A driver (lm75) is causing many 'timeout waiting for bus ready' errors.
SDA remains high (as it should), but SCL remains low after a NACK.
The bus becomes _unusable for other clients_.
While probing, "lm75" writes a command, followed by a read + stop,
but the
13 matches
Mail list logo