Re: [RESEND/PATCH] i2c: pxa: Use suspend() and resume() instead of the _noirq hooks

2014-11-12 Thread Wolfram Sang
suspend/resume order depends on probe ordering, so with deferred probe, the probe ordering might be right, but it should be thoroughly tested. Thanks a lot for the input here, Kevin! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [RESEND/PATCH] i2c: pxa: Use suspend() and resume() instead of the _noirq hooks

2014-10-22 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
On 10/20/2014 06:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Ezequiel Garcia ezequ...@vanguardiasur.com.ar writes: The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the suspended state. The {suspend,resume}_noirq usage was

Re: [RESEND/PATCH] i2c: pxa: Use suspend() and resume() instead of the _noirq hooks

2014-10-22 Thread Kevin Hilman
Ezequiel Garcia ezequ...@vanguardiasur.com.ar writes: On 10/20/2014 06:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Ezequiel Garcia ezequ...@vanguardiasur.com.ar writes: The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the

[RESEND/PATCH] i2c: pxa: Use suspend() and resume() instead of the _noirq hooks

2014-10-20 Thread Ezequiel Garcia
The _noirq were previously chosen to make sure all the users of the adapter were suspended by the time the adapter itself enters the suspended state. The {suspend,resume}_noirq usage was converted from an earlier implementation based on suspend_late and resume_early on this commit: commit