Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option

2017-06-05 Thread Erez D
last time i checked (a year ago) with celcom, it depended on the APN sphone - used NAT internetg - did not use NAT On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 1:12 AM, E.S. Rosenberg wrote: > Hi all, > I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure > where I am living so I'm looking at using a ce

Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option

2017-06-03 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
2017-06-03 20:21 GMT+03:00 Noam Meltzer : > Hi, > > Partner are offering "real" IPv4 address for an extra fee to their business > customers. > I've previously set such a configuration for my parents in law and for the > past 3.5 years it's working flawlessly AFAIK. > > I don't know if they offer IP

Re: [OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option

2017-06-03 Thread Noam Meltzer
Hi, Partner are offering "real" IPv4 address for an extra fee to their business customers. I've previously set such a configuration for my parents in law and for the past 3.5 years it's working flawlessly AFAIK. I don't know if they offer IPv6 and the reasons for originally choosing Partner are n

[OT] Any Cellphone providers have a non-NAT option

2017-06-01 Thread E.S. Rosenberg
Hi all, I was told by Bezeq that they currently don't have infrastructure where I am living so I'm looking at using a cellular modem instead. Ideally I'd like to have some remote access to home but if the Cellular network is Carrier Grade NAT I can forget about that (unless I create a reverse SSH t