[PATCH] netdev: carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-02-24 Thread Denis Du
terminate the protocol handshaking. Signed-off-by: Denis Du --- drivers/net/wan/hdlc_ppp.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_ppp.c b/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_ppp.c index afeca6b..ab8b3cb 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wan/hdlc_ppp.c +++ b/drivers/net

Re: [PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-02-20 Thread Denis Du
Hi, David: How  is your thinking about this patch? >From b5902a4dfc709b62b704997ab64f31c9ef69a6db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Du Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:26:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] netdev: carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation Sometimes when physical lines hav

Re: [PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-02-06 Thread Denis Du
esday, February 6, 2018, 10:29:53 AM EST, David Miller wrote: From: Denis Du Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 15:15:28 + (UTC) > How  do you think my patch? > > As you see, Krzysztof  think my patch is ok to be accepted. > But if you have a better idea to fix it,I am glad to see it. Anyw

Re: [PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-02-06 Thread Denis Du
Hi, David: How  do you think my patch? As you see, Krzysztof  think my patch is ok to be accepted. But if you have a better idea to fix it,I am glad to see it. Anyway, this issue have to be fixed. Denis DU On Sunday, January 28, 2018, 9:34:15 AM EST, Krzysztof Halasa wrote

Re: [PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-01-23 Thread Denis Du
it is not my theory guessing, it is a real problem. On Monday, January 22, 2018, 3:25:16 PM EST, David Miller wrote: From: Denis Du Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:58:25 + (UTC) > From b5902a4dfc709b62b704997ab64f31c9ef69a6db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Denis Du > Dat

Re: [PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-01-22 Thread Denis Du
will be up, Because the carrier down and up again and then trigger the timer to restart. Denis Du On Monday, January 22, 2018, 3:25:16 PM EST, David Miller wrote: From: Denis Du Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:58:25 + (UTC) > From b5902a4dfc709b62b704997ab64f31c9ef69a6db Mon Sep 17 00

[PATCH] Carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation

2018-01-16 Thread Denis Du
n Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Du Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:26:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] netdev: carrier detect ok, don't turn off negotiation Sometimes when physical lines have a just good noise to make the protocol handshaking fail, but the carrier detect still good. Then after rem

Re: [PATCH] n_tty: Add memory barrier to fix race condition in receive path

2014-12-30 Thread Denis Du
Hi, guys: I confirmed the Patch worked great on non-SMP 3.12 kernel. But on SMP it will still have race condition happened. Does anyone have another patch for the SMP as mentioned in commit 19e2ad6a09f0c06dbca19c98e5f4584269d913dd Denis Du - Original Message - From: Peter Hurley

Re: [PATCH] TTY: Fix the missing lock for the TTY ldisc buffer

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Du
On 12/10/2014, 07:38 PM, Denis Du wrote: > > Hi, Guys: Hi, are you sending this using some robot? I think I have seen like ten copies of this patch already. Sorry, I always have troubles to send the patch in correct format, even now I am not 100% sure this patch have the c

[PATCH] TTY: Fix the missing lock for the TTY ldisc buffer

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Du
Hi, Guys: It was found that the 3.12 kernel tty layer will lose or corrupt data when have a full-duplex communication, especially in high baud rate, for example 230k for my OMAP5 uart. Eventually I found there is lock missing between copy data to ldisc layer buffer and copy data from the same

[PATCH] TTY: Fix the missing lock for the TTY ldisc buffer

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Du
Hi, Guys: It was found that the 3.12 kernel tty layer will lose or corrupt data when have a full-duplex communication, especially in high baud rate, for example 230k for my OMAP5 uart. Eventually I found there is lock missing between copy data to ldisc layer buffer and copy data from the same

[PATCH] Fix the missing lock for the TTY ldisc buffer

2014-12-10 Thread Denis Du
Hi, Guys: It was found that the 3.12 kernel tty layer will lose or corrupt data when have a full-duplex communication, especially in high baud rate, for example 230k for my OMAP5 uart. Eventually I found there is lock missing between copy data to ldisc layer buffer and copy data from the same

Re: [PATCH] TTY: missing a lock to access the ldisk buffer

2014-12-09 Thread Denis Du
Hi, Jeremiah: This patch was generated base on 3.12 kernel. But possibly I have a wrong format to put this patch on a plain text. I am working to do a new patch now. Denis Du - Original Message - From: Jeremiah Mahler To: Denis Du Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Se

[PATCH] TTY: missing a lock to access the ldisk buffer

2014-12-08 Thread Denis Du
Hi, Guys: I found that the 3.12 kernel tty layer will lose or corrupt data when having a full-duplex communication, especcially in high baudrate, for example 230k for my OMAP5 uart. Eventually I found there is a lock missing between copy data to ldisc layer buffer and copy data from the same buf

TTY layer need a lock to copy data to user space

2014-12-05 Thread Denis Du
lock atomic_read_lock, but it doesn’t work. Denis Du--- drivers/tty/n_tty.c-old 2014-10-16 16:39:35.909350338 -0400 +++ drivers/tty/n_tty.c 2014-10-16 16:49:00.004930469 -0400 @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ struct mutex atomic_read_lock; struct mutex output_lock; + struct mutex read_buf_lock; }; s