ul 2005 01:46:52 +0300
Jar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael B Allen wrote:
> > hostap_pci: 0.3.9 - 2005-06-10 (Jouni Malinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
> > ACPI: PCI interrupt :02:02.0[A] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
> > hostap_pci: Registered netdevice
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 17:08:38 +0300 (EEST)
"Jar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > FYI:
> >
> > Please use more suitable driver for 802.11b Prism cards. This kind of
> > driver is
> > hostap_pci (for PCI cards). It can be downloaded from
> > http://hostap.epitest.fi/
> >
> > This driver really wor
My wireless is a little fragile. I have a Thinkpad T30 with a MiniPCI card:
02:02.0 Network controller: Intersil Corporation Prism 2.5 Wavelan chipset (rev
01)
Subsystem: Intel Corp. Wireless 802.11b MiniPCI Adapter
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 11
Memo
Yup!
nano kernel: parport0: PC-style at 0x378, irq 7 [SPP,PS2,EPP]
nano kernel: parport0: Printer, Hewlett-Packard HP LaserJet 6L
I setup everything as you describe below. I don't remember having to
do all this stuff before(on other machines anyway). I guess I'm used to
RH's fluffed-up stock ke
The parallel port is not being detected on my ABIT KT7A KT133 w/ Athlon
900 running 2.2.17 w/ Hendricks IDE patches and RH 6.2. I tried most of
the settings in the bios.
BIOS options are:
728/IRQ5
378/IRQ7
3BC/IRQ7
with the possible modes:
Normal
EPP
1.9 or 1.7
ECP
DMA 3 or 1
Does this have to do with the thing that kills off processes when memory
is low?
Feb 23 04:39:32 nano kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for xkill
Maybe xkill should be something allowed to run? The app that I ran
freaked(slrnconf) and snarfed up all my memory rapidly. If I could have
kille
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 03:48:06PM -0800, Wayne Whitney wrote:
> > append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
>
> The idebus=66 part is incorrect. This option refers to the clock of
> the PCI bus the IDE controller is on and should rarely be changed from
> the default of 33MHz (i.e., only if you are overclo
I've enabled the higher performance features for my ATA drive by getting
2.2.17, applying Andre Hendrick's IDE patch, adding:
append="idebus=66 ide0=ata66"
to lilo.conf. I was told that Alan's patches from here:
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan
should be used. Is this true if I
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 06:33:36AM -0500, safemode wrote:
> > What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
>
> There are no problems with 2.2.x.
I'm very glad to hear that because the AMD chips are the obvious
choice for a lot of people(all?).
> (classic), get the K
Hello,
What's the nature of the VIA chipset problems? I want to get a new system
this weekend but I read on kernel traffic that VIA has problems? I
wan't to use Hendrick's ide patches on 2.2.18. What board should I
get? Help, I've searched through usenet and asked on #linux without
anything concl
10 matches
Mail list logo
