On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 13:16 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > It would be useful to know if a kernel built with no DMA support for the
> > > IT8212 behaved as that might give us a clue about what is choking. If you
> > > look in drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c:it821x_init_one you'll see a pair of
> > > lines
On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 10:49 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 20:23:24 -0500
> Rodney Gordon II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Have been quite busy, and I regret I haven't tried a rc kernel in
> > awhile, but, this bug has gone un-fixed still.. Thought
Have been quite busy, and I regret I haven't tried a rc kernel in
awhile, but, this bug has gone un-fixed still.. Thought I'd throw in
another "heads up"..
2.6.22 hang: http://spherevision.org/sync/visual/itelock.jpg
lspci -vvv: http://spherevision.org/sync/tmp/lspci.out
Pentium-D 830 3.0GHz Dual
This is the screen image I took with my digital camera when bootup
freezes:
http://spherevision.org/sync/visual/itefreeze.jpg
After this freeze, not even SysRq commands work.
On a side-note, the non-libata drivers boot up, but throw tons of DMA
errors after one DVD burn.
The kernel I tested this
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 00:53, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 16:10, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 09:51 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > On 13/03/07, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > As soon as your cpu is fully utilized, fairness looses or
> > > >
On Sunday 04 March 2007 01:00, Con Kolivas wrote:
> This message is to announce the first general public release of the
> "Rotating Staircase DeadLine" cpu scheduler.
>
> Based on previous work from the staircase cpu scheduler I set out to
> design, from scratch, a new scheduling policy design whic
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 00:15 -0600, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > mdew . writes:
> >
> > > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiv
On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 13:38 +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> mdew . writes:
>
> > On 2/16/07, Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This patchset is designed to improve system responsiveness and
> >> interactivity.
> >> It is configurable to any workload but the default -ck patch is aimed at
>
t; >
> > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:49, Rodney Gordon II wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 05:03:24PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > > > These are patches designed to improve system responsiveness and
> > > > interactivity. It is configurable to any wor
/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-ck1/patch-2.6.13-ck1-server.bz2
I am having odd lockup problems with just the non-+ 'stable' ck lately..
Trying a large copy will often lock my disk I/O up and I have to do a hard
reboot. Nothing shows in logs..
Is anyone having similar problems?
-r
--
Rodney Gordon II
10 matches
Mail list logo
