Re: iwconfig seg-faults

On 28 Jun 2001, Rodrigo Ventura wrote: > SuSE 7.1, wireless-tools-20-5, kernel 2.4.5-pre3: > > /root# gdb iwconfig > [...] > (gdb) run wvlan0 [...] > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0xc22ab05c in ?? () > > Can't get any further useful info from gdb. > >

Re: [QUESTION] "No 100Hz timer" thread - any LKML archive?

On Thu, 17 May 2001, Tomas Telensky wrote: > does anybody know about any archive/digest service for this mailing > list? Majordomo at vger doesn't support this. Or does anybody of you > archive all e-mails? > > I'm especially interested in the _WHOLE_ thread "No 100Hz timer !" now. > (but the que

2.4.2-ac3 IDE-Module-Deadlock on DEC Alpha

hi... Machine: DEC Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT) boots from scsi, and ide is used modular IDE-Controller: Promise ATA100 controller (PCI card) bios knows absolutely nothing about IDE (there aren't even options to set drive geometry etc) Deadlocks on loading the

Alpha compile error on 2.4.2-ac3 (irq_err_count)

hi... Machine: DEC-Alpha XL300 (Alcor/XLT) Kernel: 2.4.2-ac3 Compile-Error: make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/arch/alpha/kernel' gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac3/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -mno-fp-regs -ffi

Re: lkml subject line

On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Mike A. Harris wrote: [cc-list trimmed] > That said, and while we're on the topic.. Does anyone have a > *PERFECT* recipe for procmail to REMOVE the stupid [Dummy] things > most GNU mailman lists and others prepend to the subject? I am using the following to sort the suse-s

Re: 2.4.0-test12: SiS pirq handling..

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote: > give 2.4.0-test12 a final whirl before I release it as 2.4.1? We got a lot [...] > The other changes in pre12 aren't likely to be all that noticeable, unless [...] > Linus Seems that even you are still confused with -testXX and -preXX ;)

Re: [QUESTION]: Applying patches ontop of patches (2.4.1pre7 to2.4.1pre8)

On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Shawn Starr wrote: > What is the best way to apply a patch on top of a patch already applied? > > For example, with original sources 2.4.0 i applied 2.4.1pre7 but now > that pre8 is out, how do i apply those new patches without having to > delete the whole linux dir and untar

Re: ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded

On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, rtviado wrote: > I got this in my logs: > > ip_conntrack: maximum limit of 16368 entries exceeded > > what does this mean, I know i can change the limits in > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max, but I want to know what this is for. This means that iptable is tracking more

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > > You have a hard destroke clipping on the drive. > > Go look at you logs. > > Yep, logs indicate that.. > > Sven, how did you kill the clipping ?? > Or in generic, how do I kill the clipping ? I did'nt know something like that even existed :) Just

Re: 2.2.18 and Maxtor 96147H6 (61 GB)

On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: > kernel 2.2.18 hates my Maxtor drive : > > ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > hda: Maxtor 96147H6, 32253MB w/2048kB Cache, CHS=65531/16/63, (U)DMA > > Actual (correct) parameters : CHS=119112/16/63 > > Looks like some short int (2 bytes) overflowing

Re: 2.2.18-23 w/Frame Buffer (LEVEL IV)

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > A level IV issue in 2.2.18-23. With frame buffer enabled, upon boot, > the OS is displaying four penguin images instead of one penguin in the > upper left corner of the screen. Looks rather tacky. Also puts the VGA > text mode default into mode 274.

Re: Installing kernel 2.4

On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, David Lang wrote: > depending on what CPU you have the kernel (and compiler) can use different > commands/opmizations/etc, if you want to do this on boot you have two > options. Wouldn't it be possible to compile the parts of the kernel needed to uncompress and to detect the

Re: Adding vendor drivers...

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Pavel Machek wrote: > Well, having .in and .mak files with single lines in them seems ugly > to me. What about make dep scanning for > > /* Makefile: obj-$(CONFIG_MY_DRIVER) += mydriver.o */ > /* Config.in: bool CONFIG_MY_DRIVER */ > > in .c files? Isn't "m

Re: [PATCH] Re: SCSI scanning

On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote: > Oh God , I hope this doesn't mean what I think it might ? > Please tell me I am stil going to be able to 'Statically' compile > in the drivers of my choosing ? Tia , JimL This discussion is about using one initialization

Re: [OT] incremental patch of two patches?

On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Jorge Nerin wrote: > This is a little offtopic, but as everybody here uses patches everyday,, > someone migth have an answer for this. > > How can I make a incremental patch of two other patches without making > two trees? have a look at interdiff (http://people.redhat.com/t