>Here's a patch against 2.4.5 so we can display a decent number of
>penguins at boot time (wraps the display of the boot penguins when
>they can't all fit on one line).
>
>Chris.
What is the point of displaying penguins in framebuffer mode if it is going
to change the video mode set by the vga=
Here's a patch against 2.4.5 so we can display a decent number of
penguins at boot time (wraps the display of the boot penguins when
they can't all fit on one line).
Chris.
What is the point of displaying penguins in framebuffer mode if it is going
to change the video mode set by the vga=
>_I_ think it's childish to claim the above. You _may_ have a choice, yes, but
>is that choice equal or fair? Microsoft has infected both the user area as
>much as the business/work area. If you want to purchase a PC because your
>computer just fried and you want to finish a paper or something,
_I_ think it's childish to claim the above. You _may_ have a choice, yes, but
is that choice equal or fair? Microsoft has infected both the user area as
much as the business/work area. If you want to purchase a PC because your
computer just fried and you want to finish a paper or something, but
>
>I still have my 3.1 package all boxed up in the basement. I remember
>impatiently waiting for its arrival. What a disappointment it turned
>out to be.
>
>Mark
To say the least. The big thing in the current Windows OS's these days is
FAT 32.
NT 3.1 and NT 3.5 won't even acknowledge this
I still have my 3.1 package all boxed up in the basement. I remember
impatiently waiting for its arrival. What a disappointment it turned
out to be.
Mark
To say the least. The big thing in the current Windows OS's these days is
FAT 32.
NT 3.1 and NT 3.5 won't even acknowledge this file
>I have come to the conclusion that linux is NOT suitable for the general
>desktop market.
I have to disagree on this. It runs fine on most PC's, as they use standard
devices.
Just say NO to anything proprietary. This includes Toshiba. Makers of such
odd machines
should supply their own
I have come to the conclusion that linux is NOT suitable for the general
desktop market.
I have to disagree on this. It runs fine on most PC's, as they use standard
devices.
Just say NO to anything proprietary. This includes Toshiba. Makers of such
odd machines
should supply their own native
> >I'd be happy to write a new routine in assembly
>
>I sincerely hope you're joking.
>
>It's the algorithm that needs fixing, not the implementation of that
>algorithm. Writing in assembler? Hope you're proficient at writing in
>x86, PPC, 68k, MIPS (several varieties), ARM, SPARC, and
>Is anybody interested in making "swapoff()" better? Please speak up..
>
> Linus
I'd be happy to write a new routine in assembly, if I had a clue as to how
the VM algorithm works in Linux. What should swapoff do if all physical
memory is in use? How does the swapping algorithm
>Furthermore, I am not demanding anything, much less "priority fixing"
>for this bug. Its my personal opinion that this is the most critical bug
>in the 2.4 series, and if I had the time and skill, this is what I would
>be working on. Because I don't have the time and skill, I am perfectly
Furthermore, I am not demanding anything, much less priority fixing
for this bug. Its my personal opinion that this is the most critical bug
in the 2.4 series, and if I had the time and skill, this is what I would
be working on. Because I don't have the time and skill, I am perfectly
happy to
Is anybody interested in making swapoff() better? Please speak up..
Linus
I'd be happy to write a new routine in assembly, if I had a clue as to how
the VM algorithm works in Linux. What should swapoff do if all physical
memory is in use? How does the swapping algorithm
I'd be happy to write a new routine in assembly
I sincerely hope you're joking.
It's the algorithm that needs fixing, not the implementation of that
algorithm. Writing in assembler? Hope you're proficient at writing in
x86, PPC, 68k, MIPS (several varieties), ARM, SPARC, and whatever other
This is probably a mundane question, but...
Is there a way to recycle unused PID's without rebooting the kernel?
So instead of the next available PID always getting larger and larger,
just reset it to use the first unused PID after 1. Is this possible?
-- Ted
-
To
This is probably a mundane question, but...
Is there a way to recycle unused PID's without rebooting the kernel?
So instead of the next available PID always getting larger and larger,
just reset it to use the first unused PID after 1. Is this possible?
-- Ted
-
To
Are there any plans for including support for the ATI Rage 128 chipset into
svgalib?
The VESA setting does not work. Causes any program using svgalib to crash.
Are there any configuration settings in the kernel that may help with this?
The kernel I am using is 2.4.4 and the card I am using is
Are there any plans for including support for the ATI Rage 128 chipset into
svgalib?
The VESA setting does not work. Causes any program using svgalib to crash.
Are there any configuration settings in the kernel that may help with this?
The kernel I am using is 2.4.4 and the card I am using is
> ... added basic support for the Pentium IV. Unfortunately Intel
chose to
> ignore all precedent in model numbering via cpuid and report a
> family of '15'. This sudden jump broke assumptions in the
> kernel tree without any warning. Intel have failed to
... added basic support for the Pentium IV. Unfortunately Intel
chose to
ignore all precedent in model numbering via cpuid and report a
family of '15'. This sudden jump broke assumptions in the
kernel tree without any warning. Intel have failed to
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
> > I've never seen such thing as code without bugs. In my experience,
> > the NVIDIA drivers are by far the most complete and solid 3D drivers
> > under Linux.
>
> You are welcome to your opinion. I've got this great bridge to sell you
too
The most stable of all video drivers under Linux has to
I've never seen such thing as code without bugs. In my experience,
the NVIDIA drivers are by far the most complete and solid 3D drivers
under Linux.
You are welcome to your opinion. I've got this great bridge to sell you
too
The most stable of all video drivers under Linux has to be the
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
There was
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
There was
- Original Message -
From:
Android
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:20
PM
Subject: Questions about Kernel
2.4.0.?
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make modules_inst
- Original Message -
From:
Android
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:20
PM
Subject: Questions about Kernel
2.4.0.?
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make modules_install
There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make
modules_install).What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets
confused.
Lines missing from
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/uaccess.h: #define
put_user_ret(x,ptr,ret) ({ if (put_user(x,ptr))
There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make
modules_install).What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets
confused.
Lines missing from
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/uaccess.h: #define
put_user_ret(x,ptr,ret) ({ if (put_user(x,ptr)) return
30 matches
Mail list logo
