* Russell King - ARM Linux [160127 03:19]:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
> > missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
> > linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> In my opinion this patch is not support for new hardware. It just add
> missing DT definition for one specific board for HW which was added to
> linux kernel in v4.2-rc1 version. For me it looks like that needed DT
> definition was forgo
On Thursday 21 January 2016 16:54:08 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:38:57AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek [160121 02:19]:
> > > On Thu 2016-01-21 09:29:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > The merge window is open, which is when development cod
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:38:57AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Pavel Machek [160121 02:19]:
> > On Thu 2016-01-21 09:29:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > The merge window is open, which is when development code that was merged
> > > in good time prior to the merge window is sent upstre
* Pavel Machek [160121 02:19]:
> On Thu 2016-01-21 09:29:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > The merge window is open, which is when development code that was merged
> > in good time prior to the merge window is sent upstream to Linus. Linux
> > maintainers may choose not to merge new code in
On Thu 2016-01-21 09:29:10, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The merge window is open, which is when development code that was merged
> in good time prior to the merge window is sent upstream to Linus. Linux
> maintainers may choose not to merge new code into their tree to avoid
> disrupting the
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Ok, but for whole month I do not see any response that somebody take
> this patch into some queue or tree. Which could means that patch was
> either ignored or is living somewhere and could be lost.
You sent it the day after Christmas d
Ok, but for whole month I do not see any response that somebody take
this patch into some queue or tree. Which could means that patch was
either ignored or is living somewhere and could be lost.
On Thursday 21 January 2016 09:29:10 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The merge window is open, which
The merge window is open, which is when development code that was merged
in good time prior to the merge window is sent upstream to Linus. Linux
maintainers may choose not to merge new code into their tree to avoid
disrupting the utility of linux-next until the merge window has closed.
linux-next
On Saturday 26 December 2015 00:40:12 Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds adp1653 device into n900 DT structure. DT support in
> adp1653 driver is there since v4.2-rc1 version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts | 15 +++
> 1 file changed, 15 ins
On Sat 2015-12-26 00:40:12, Pali Rohár wrote:
> This patch adds adp1653 device into n900 DT structure. DT support in
> adp1653 driver is there since v4.2-rc1 version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
Acked-by: Pavel Machek
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
h
This patch adds adp1653 device into n900 DT structure. DT support in
adp1653 driver is there since v4.2-rc1 version.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dts b/arch/arm/b
12 matches
Mail list logo