Jeff Layton writes:
> On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 20:43 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Luis Henriques wrote:
>> >
>> > A NULL pointer dereference may occur in __ceph_remove_cap with some of the
>> > callbacks used in ceph_iterate_session_caps, namely trim_caps_cb and
>> >
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 20:43 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Luis Henriques wrote:
> >
> > A NULL pointer dereference may occur in __ceph_remove_cap with some of the
> > callbacks used in ceph_iterate_session_caps, namely trim_caps_cb and
> > remove_session_caps_cb. The
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 6:48 PM Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> A NULL pointer dereference may occur in __ceph_remove_cap with some of the
> callbacks used in ceph_iterate_session_caps, namely trim_caps_cb and
> remove_session_caps_cb. These aren't protected against the concurrent
> execution of __ceph
On Thu, 2020-11-12 at 10:45 +, Luis Henriques wrote:
> A NULL pointer dereference may occur in __ceph_remove_cap with some of the
> callbacks used in ceph_iterate_session_caps, namely trim_caps_cb and
> remove_session_caps_cb. These aren't protected against the concurrent
> execution of __ceph
A NULL pointer dereference may occur in __ceph_remove_cap with some of the
callbacks used in ceph_iterate_session_caps, namely trim_caps_cb and
remove_session_caps_cb. These aren't protected against the concurrent
execution of __ceph_remove_cap.
Since the callers of this function hold the i_ceph_
5 matches
Mail list logo