On Sun 04-11-18 07:44:56, Yangtao Li wrote:
> WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to use
> unlikely.
We should just get rid of this ugliness altogether. It no longer serves
its purpose. This is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk
was called outside of the
On Sun 04-11-18 07:44:56, Yangtao Li wrote:
> WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to use
> unlikely.
We should just get rid of this ugliness altogether. It no longer serves
its purpose. This is a historical artifact from 2005 where do_brk
was called outside of the
WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to use
unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li
---
mm/mmap.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 6c04292e16a7..2077008ade0c 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@
WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to use
unlikely.
Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li
---
mm/mmap.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 6c04292e16a7..2077008ade0c 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@
4 matches
Mail list logo