Hi,
is there any new state?
kernel test robot reports the following problem (i do not see it when compiling
for my arm/arm64 devices):
ARCH=i386
drivers/pci/probe.c: In function 'pci_register_host_bridge':
>> drivers/pci/probe.c:930:39: error: 'struct device' has no member named
>> 'msi_domai
Hi,
5.11-rc1 is also affected, here is the relevant part of trace from my
bananapi-r2:
[5.792659] mtk-pcie 1a14.pcie: PCI host bridge to bus :00
[5.798879] pci_bus :00: root bus resource [bus 00-ff]
[5.804412] pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0x-0x] (bus
a
Hi,
any new state here?
last fix works, but i have not seen it approved by anyone for merge or sent as
separate Patch
regards Frank
On 2020-11-05 23:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05 2020 at 09:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-11-04 23:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
/* Resource alignment requirements */
resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
If that's the direction of travel, we also nee
On Thu, Nov 05 2020 at 09:20, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-04 23:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> /* Resource alignment requirements */
>> resource_size_t (*align_resource)(struct pci_dev *dev,
>
> If that's the direction of travel, we also need something like this
> for configuration wh
Marc's Patch based on thomas' last one also seems to work well for r2, again no
warning, PCI and AHCI (connected to pcie bus) working
regards Frank
On 2020-11-04 23:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[...]
TBH, that's butt ugly. So after staring long enough into the PCI code I
came up with a way to transport that information to the probe code.
That allows a particular device to say 'I can't do MSI' and at the same
time keeps the warning machinery
Frank,
On Wed, Nov 04 2020 at 17:49, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>> Von: "Thomas Gleixner"
>> Any architecture which selects PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS and does not have
>> irqdomain support runs into:
>>
>> if (!d)
>> bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
>>
>> which in turn makes pc
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. November 2020 um 11:16 Uhr
> Von: "Thomas Gleixner"
> Any architecture which selects PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS and does not have
> irqdomain support runs into:
>
> if (!d)
> bus->bus_flags |= PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI;
>
> which in turn makes pci_msi_support
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 11:41, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-03 10:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> We can do that, although I worried that it isn't 100% reliable:
>
> pci_host_probe() ends up calling pci_add_device(), and will start
> probing devices if the endpoint drivers have already registered
>
On 2020-11-03 10:31, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 09:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-11-02 22:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
So we really need some other solution and removing the warning is not
an option. If MSI is enabled then we want to get a warning when a PCI
device has no MSI
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 09:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-02 22:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> So we really need some other solution and removing the warning is not
>> an option. If MSI is enabled then we want to get a warning when a PCI
>> device has no MSI domain associated. Explicitly expre
On 2020-11-03 10:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 09:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-11-02 22:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 17:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 11:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
On Tue, Nov 03 2020 at 09:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-02 22:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 17:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 11:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -871,6 +871,8 @@ static
On 2020-11-02 22:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 17:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 11:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -871,6 +871,8 @@ static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus
*bus)
d =
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 17:16, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 11:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -871,6 +871,8 @@ static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(struct pci_bus
>> *bus)
>> d = pci_host_bridge_msi_domain(b);
>>
On Mon, Nov 02 2020 at 11:30, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2020-11-01 22:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The following patch makes it work for me (GICv3 guest without an ITS)by
> checking for the presence of an MSI domain at the point where we
> actually
> perform this association, and before starting to
> Gesendet: Montag, 02. November 2020 um 14:58 Uhr
> Von: "Marc Zyngier"
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> index d15c881e2e7e..5bb1306162c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
> @@ -387,10 +387,20 @@ static ssize_t msi_bus_store(
On 2020-11-02 11:56, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
looks good on bananapi-r2, no warning, pcie-card and hdd recognized
Thanks for giving it a shot. Still needs a bit of tweaking, as I expect
it to break configurations that select CONFIG_PCI_MSI_ARCH_FALLBACKS
(we have to assume that MSIs can be handl
looks good on bananapi-r2, no warning, pcie-card and hdd recognized
regards Frank
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 4289030b0fff..bb363eb103a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -871,6 +871,8 @@ static void pci_set_bus_msi_domain(st
On 2020-11-01 22:27, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sun, Nov 01 2020 at 21:47, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:27:13 +,
Frank Wunderlich wrote:
Thinking of it a bit more, I think this is the wrong solution.
PCI MSIs are optional, and not a requirement. I can trivially spin a
VM with
On Sun, Nov 01 2020 at 21:47, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:27:13 +,
> Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Thinking of it a bit more, I think this is the wrong solution.
>
> PCI MSIs are optional, and not a requirement. I can trivially spin a
> VM with PCI devices and yet no MSI capabilit
On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 18:27:13 +,
Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 01. November 2020 um 18:54 Uhr
> > Von: "Ryder Lee"
>
> > Yea, mt7623 (mtk_pcie_soc_v1) does not support MSI, so that's a way to
> > handle it.
> >
> > @Frank, could you help to test it?
> >
> > Ryder
>
> comp
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 01. November 2020 um 18:54 Uhr
> Von: "Ryder Lee"
> Yea, mt7623 (mtk_pcie_soc_v1) does not support MSI, so that's a way to
> handle it.
>
> @Frank, could you help to test it?
>
> Ryder
compiles clean for mt7623/armhf and mt7622/aarch64 so far
at least bananapi-r2/mt7623 boo
On Sun, 2020-11-01 at 11:43 +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:25:04 +,
> Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> >
> > Am 31. Oktober 2020 22:49:14 MEZ schrieb Thomas Gleixner
> > :
> >
> > >That's not a fix. It's just supressing the warning.
> >
> > Ok sorry
> >
> > >So it needs to b
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 01. November 2020 um 12:43 Uhr
> Von: "Marc Zyngier"
> On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:25:04 +,
> Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > It looks like for mt7623 there is no msi domain setup (done via
> > mtk_pcie_setup_irq callback + mtk_pcie_init_irq_domain) in mtk pcie
> > driver.
>
>
On Sun, 01 Nov 2020 09:25:04 +,
Frank Wunderlich wrote:
>
> Am 31. Oktober 2020 22:49:14 MEZ schrieb Thomas Gleixner :
>
> >That's not a fix. It's just supressing the warning.
>
> Ok sorry
>
> >So it needs to be figured out why the domain association is not there.
>
> It looks like for mt
On Sun, Nov 01 2020 at 10:25, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> Am 31. Oktober 2020 22:49:14 MEZ schrieb Thomas Gleixner :
>
>>So it needs to be figured out why the domain association is not there.
>
> It looks like for mt7623 there is no msi domain setup (done via
> mtk_pcie_setup_irq callback + mtk_pcie_
Am 31. Oktober 2020 22:49:14 MEZ schrieb Thomas Gleixner :
>That's not a fix. It's just supressing the warning.
Ok sorry
>So it needs to be figured out why the domain association is not there.
It looks like for mt7623 there is no msi domain setup (done via
mtk_pcie_setup_irq callback + mtk_pci
Frank,
On Sat, Oct 31 2020 at 15:03, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> From: Frank Wunderlich
>
> 5.10 shows these warnings on bootup while enabling pcie
> at least on bananapi-r2:
>
> [6.161730] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 73 at include/linux/msi.h:213
> pci_msi_setup_
> msi_irqs.constprop.0+0x78/0x80
> .
From: Frank Wunderlich
5.10 shows these warnings on bootup while enabling pcie
at least on bananapi-r2:
[6.161730] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 73 at include/linux/msi.h:213 pci_msi_setup_
msi_irqs.constprop.0+0x78/0x80
[6.724607] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 73 at include/linux/msi.h:219 free_msi_
31 matches
Mail list logo
