Hi,
John Youn writes:
> On 1/12/2017 7:52 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>> ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
>> for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
>> value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load
Hi,
John Youn writes:
> On 1/12/2017 7:52 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>> ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
>> for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
>> value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load on the hrtimer
On 1/12/2017 7:52 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
> for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
> value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load on the hrtimer subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas
On 1/12/2017 7:52 AM, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
> for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
> value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load on the hrtimer subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas
ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load on the hrtimer subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
---
Patch was compile
ulseep_range() uses hrtimers and provides no advantage over msleep()
for larger delays. Fix up the 20+ ms delays here passing the adjusted "min"
value to msleep(). This helps reduce the load on the hrtimer subsystem.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
---
Patch was compile tested with:
6 matches
Mail list logo