On 03/22/18 at 03:38pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:37:20 +0800 Baoquan He wrote:
>
> > The current kexec_file ignores kexec_buf.top_down value when call
> > arch_kexec_walk_mem() to allocate memory for loading kernel/initrd
> > stuffs. This is not supposed to be what kexec_buf.
On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:37:20 +0800 Baoquan He wrote:
> The current kexec_file ignores kexec_buf.top_down value when call
> arch_kexec_walk_mem() to allocate memory for loading kernel/initrd
> stuffs. This is not supposed to be what kexec_buf.top_down is used
> for.
OK, but why is this a problem?
The current kexec_file ignores kexec_buf.top_down value when call
arch_kexec_walk_mem() to allocate memory for loading kernel/initrd
stuffs. This is not supposed to be what kexec_buf.top_down is used
for.
In patch 0001, introduce a new function walk_system_ram_res_rev()
which is a variant of walk_
3 matches
Mail list logo