Andrew, unless you stop me right now, I am going to send the following patches in addition:
[PATCH] kill cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(wq, dwork) does not need the first parameter, it could be figured out from dwork. So we can rename it to cancel_rearming_delayed_work after the simple change and fix all callers. In other words: - cancel_rearming_delayed_work(dwork) will work for any workqueue, not just keventd_wq. - all callers of cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() will be converted to use it. No? This breaks the public interface, but we already did this recently ... [PATCH] kill flush_work_keventd() The same is true for flush_work(), it doesn't need the "struct workqueue_struct *wq" parameter. I missed this fact when I was doing flush_work(). This change is obviously good to do before flush_work() goes to mainline. Also, I think the name "flush_work" is very bad. Isn't it better to rename it as well? cancel_work? cancel_work_sync? whatever. [PATCH] bonus: mark kernel/workqueue.c as CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL too many non-reviewed changes ... Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/