On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 5:20 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:02:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Now that we have MAP_SHARED, MAP_PRIVATE and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on all
> > architectures, it probably makes sense to de-duplicate these
> > and put them into a com
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:02:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Now that we have MAP_SHARED, MAP_PRIVATE and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on all
> architectures, it probably makes sense to de-duplicate these
> and put them into a common header.
>
> Please review and consider merging though the generi
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 08:12:47PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:02:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Now that we have MAP_SHARED, MAP_PRIVATE and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on all
> > architectures, it probably makes sense to de-duplicate these
> > and put them into a c
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 01:02:51AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Now that we have MAP_SHARED, MAP_PRIVATE and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on all
> architectures, it probably makes sense to de-duplicate these
> and put them into a common header.
I like the idea, but it seems there are more asm/mman.h
Now that we have MAP_SHARED, MAP_PRIVATE and MAP_SHARED_VALIDATE on all
architectures, it probably makes sense to de-duplicate these
and put them into a common header.
Please review and consider merging though the generic tree.
Build tested on x86 only. Has been in linux-next for a while now.
Mi
5 matches
Mail list logo