* Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > >Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
> > > >AutoNUMA
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:40:48PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > >Hello everyone,
> > >
> > >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
> > >AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The la
* Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> >Hello everyone,
> >
> >Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
> >AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle
> >has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks!
>
On 08/22/2012 10:58 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
Hello everyone,
Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle
has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks!
Thanks for improving the code and incorp
Hello everyone,
Before the Kernel Summit, I think it's good idea to post a new
AutoNUMA24 and to go through a new review cycle. The last review cycle
has been fundamental in improving the patchset. Thanks!
The objective of AutoNUMA is to be able to perform as close as
possible to (and sometime fa
5 matches
Mail list logo