Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:45:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>
>> -static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct hist_entry *he,
>> +static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct he_stat *he_stat,
>>
Em Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> -static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct hist_entry *he,
> +static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct he_stat *he_stat,
> unsigned int cpumode, u64 period)
So it is not
Em Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
-static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct hist_entry *he,
+static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct he_stat *he_stat,
unsigned int cpumode, u64 period)
So it is not
Hi Arnaldo,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:45:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
Em Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:05PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
-static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct hist_entry *he,
+static void hist_entry__add_cpumode_period(struct he_stat *he_stat,
From: Namhyung Kim
hist_entry__add_cpumode_period() and hist_entry__decay() are dealing
with hist_entry's stat fields only. So make them use the struct
directly.
Cc: Arun Sharma
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim
---
tools/perf/util/hist.c | 20 ++--
1 file
From: Namhyung Kim namhyung@lge.com
hist_entry__add_cpumode_period() and hist_entry__decay() are dealing
with hist_entry's stat fields only. So make them use the struct
directly.
Cc: Arun Sharma asha...@fb.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim
6 matches
Mail list logo