>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:26:15PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/inclu
On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 09:26:15PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h inde
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index
> > > > bcdd3790e94d..06639fb6ab85 100644
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index
> > > bcdd3790e94d..06639fb6ab85 100644
> > > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > > @@ -44,7 +
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> > > I think if a driver can fail reliquish then it needs some kind of
> > > strategy to recover.
>
> > Maybe some driver can and some not, but if it doesn't succeed it
> > should return an error.
>
> But you can't just leave
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:17:53PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > I think if a driver can fail reliquish then it needs some kind of strategy
> > to
> > recover.
> Maybe some driver can and some not, but if it doesn't succeed it
> should return an error.
But you can't just leave the driver in
>
> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h index
> > bcdd3790e94d..06639fb6ab85 100644
> > +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct tpm_class_ops {
> > bool (*update_timeouts)(struct tpm_chip *
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 09:51:00AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/tpm.h b/include/linux/tpm.h
> index bcdd3790e94d..06639fb6ab85 100644
> +++ b/include/linux/tpm.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct tpm_class_ops {
> bool (*update_timeouts)(struct tpm_chip *chip,
>
The correct sequence is to first request locality and only after
that perform cmd_ready handshake, otherwise the hardware will drop
the subsequent message as from the device point of view the cmd_ready
handshake wasn't performed. Symmetrically locality has to be relinquished
only after going idle
9 matches
Mail list logo