On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 18:30 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
>
> The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
> happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
> support. Without it,
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 18:30 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
>
> The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
> happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
> support. Without it,
On 2018/01/15 18:41, Greg KH wrote:
> Your subject line is a bit odd :(
True, I already repaired & resent it. Sorry for the hiccup.
On 2018/01/15 18:41, Greg KH wrote:
> Your subject line is a bit odd :(
True, I already repaired & resent it. Sorry for the hiccup.
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
>
> The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
> happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
> support. Without it,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 06:30:51PM +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
>
> The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
> happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
> support. Without it,
nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
support. Without it, posix_acl_create() is a is an empty dummy
function.
So let's not pretend we will
nfs/super: set MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is enabled
The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
support. Without it, posix_acl_create() is a is an empty dummy
function.
So let's not pretend we will
8 matches
Mail list logo