* Kees Cook [141210 13:18]:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > From: Tony Lindgren
> > Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:02:37 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] pstore-ram: Allow optional mapping with pgprot_noncached
> >
> > On some ARMs the memory can be mapped pgprot_noncached() and
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> From: Tony Lindgren
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:02:37 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] pstore-ram: Allow optional mapping with pgprot_noncached
>
> On some ARMs the memory can be mapped pgprot_noncached() and still
> be working for atomic operations
* Russell King - ARM Linux [140912 16:16]:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:32:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > On some ARMs at least the memory can be mapped pgprot_noncached()
> > and still be working for atomic operations. As pointed out by
> > Colin Cross , in some cases you do want to use
> >
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 11:32:25AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On some ARMs at least the memory can be mapped pgprot_noncached()
> and still be working for atomic operations. As pointed out by
> Colin Cross , in some cases you do want to use
> pgprot_noncached() if the SoC supports it to see a de
On some ARMs at least the memory can be mapped pgprot_noncached()
and still be working for atomic operations. As pointed out by
Colin Cross , in some cases you do want to use
pgprot_noncached() if the SoC supports it to see a debug printk
just before a write hanging the system.
On ARMs, the atomic
5 matches
Mail list logo
