On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:13:27AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init call to t
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > Subject: nohz: Move nohz full init call to tick init
> >
> > From c5c38ef3d70377dc504a6a3f611a3ec814bc757b Mon Sep 17 00
0833ec22e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > > > Subject: irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> > > > >
> > > > > From 3010279f0fc36f0388872203e63ca49912f648fd Mon Sep 1
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > > Subject: irq_work: Force raised irq work to run on irq work interrupt
> > > >
> > > > From 3010279f0fc36f0388872203e63ca49912f648fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: F
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:14 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:22:35AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Doesn't build in 3.17 properly :(
>
> Older kernels can use rcu_note_context_switch() instead of
> rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(), which didn't show up unt
ect: x86: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> > >
> > > From 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > > Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> > >
> > > From 3631073659
IPI support
> >
> > From 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Frederic Weisbecker
> > Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
> >
> > From 3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>
4218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d098eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Subject: arm: Tell irq work about self IPI support
>
> From 3631073659d0aafeaa52227bb61a100efaf901dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
To: 09f6edd424218eb69078551b2ecfada1f2d09
At Tue, 14 Oct 2014 05:26:07 +0200,
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >This is the start of the stable re
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 04:39:11AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> > >There are 25 patches in this seri
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 02:35:41PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> > There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issu
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:19:56AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> >There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one. If anyone has any issu
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 08:23:19AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Stalls when using nohz, requires series of six patches to fix that
> didn't make 3.17 and weren't marked for -stable:
>
> From a80e49e2cc3145af014a8ae44f575829cc236192 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Frederic Weisbecker
> Subject: n
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:03:46PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Commit 1c40279960 ("libata: Un-break ATA blacklist") is apparently not
> > included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
>
> As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else, I'd like to
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 05:25:14PM +0200, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> >
> > I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
> > mainline) yet.
>
> Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
Now qu
Romain Francoise wrote:
> Commit 1c40279960 ("libata: Un-break ATA blacklist") is apparently not
> included, is in Linus' tree since Friday, and is rather urgent.
As the patch author, I agree. If nothing else, I'd like to be able to take
off this brown paper bag.
--
To unsubscribe from this list
On 10/12/2014 08:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sh
On 10/13/2014 08:44 AM, Romain Francoise wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues wi
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 04:24:53AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
>
> I am not complaining that the patch hasn't made it to 3.17.1 (or even
> mainline) yet.
Hmm. It's been in mainline.since last Friday, afaik.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
On 10/12/2014 07:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be ma
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014 08:28:35 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1
> > release. There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted
> > as a response to this one. If anyone has
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
> There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
Actually, 3.17 is a
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.17.1 release.
There are 25 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Wed Oct 15 02:24:45 UTC 2014.
Anything receive
24 matches
Mail list logo
