On Wednesday 04 March 2015 06:17 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
Hi,
On 04/03/15 13:24, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
This patch doesn't apply on 4.0-rc1. Can to refresh it to mainline
latest?
It depends on Axel's previous patch: "phy: exynos-mipi-video: Fixup
the test for state->regmap". Are
Hi,
On 04/03/15 13:24, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> This patch doesn't apply on 4.0-rc1. Can to refresh it to mainline
> latest?
It depends on Axel's previous patch: "phy: exynos-mipi-video: Fixup
the test for state->regmap". Are there any issues even with that patch
applied ?
--
Thanks
Sylw
Hi,
On Friday 27 February 2015 06:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
On 27/02/15 04:50, Axel Lin wrote:
he state->regmap is initialized by devm_regmap_init_mmio().
So it's fine to use spin_lock rather than mutex to protct state->regmap rmw
operations.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
Hi Sylwester,
I
On 27/02/15 04:50, Axel Lin wrote:
> he state->regmap is initialized by devm_regmap_init_mmio().
> So it's fine to use spin_lock rather than mutex to protct state->regmap rmw
> operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
> ---
> Hi Sylwester,
> I don't have this hardware handy, so can you test if thi
The state->regmap is initialized by devm_regmap_init_mmio().
So it's fine to use spin_lock rather than mutex to protct state->regmap rmw
operations.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
Hi Sylwester,
I don't have this hardware handy, so can you test if this patch works.
This patch is on top of my previous
5 matches
Mail list logo