On 09/04/2013 05:38 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 05:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hmm... why we need "uapi/linux/" ? (I can not find some related
> documents, so I have to 'guess').
The "uapi" subdirectories are t
On 09/04/2013 05:27 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
Hmm... why we need "uapi/linux/" ? (I can not find some related
documents, so I have to 'guess').
>>>
>>> The "uapi" subdirectories are there to distinguish userspace headers from
>>> k
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Hmm... why we need "uapi/linux/" ? (I can not find some related
>>> documents, so I have to 'guess').
>>
>> The "uapi" subdirectories are there to distinguish userspace headers from
>> kernelspace headers, and allow both to live in the kernel
On 09/04/2013 05:02 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 09/04/2013 03:02 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
On 09/04/2013 12:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 03:02 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> On 09/04/2013 12:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> --- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
>>
On 09/04/2013 03:02 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 09/04/2013 12:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
--- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
+++ b/include/uapi/Kbuild
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
#
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 12:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> --- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/Kbuild
>>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>>> # UAPI Header export list
>>> -# Top-level Makefile calls i
On 09/04/2013 12:41 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> --- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
>> +++ b/include/uapi/Kbuild
>> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
>> # UAPI Header export list
>> -# Top-level Makefile calls into asm-$(ARCH)
>> -# List only non-arch directories below
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 3:46 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
> --- a/include/uapi/Kbuild
> +++ b/include/uapi/Kbuild
> @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
> # UAPI Header export list
> -# Top-level Makefile calls into asm-$(ARCH)
> -# List only non-arch directories below
> -
> +# Except "linux/", UAPI means Universal API.
Sorr
Hello Maintainers:
Maybe... I still miss some important mail addresses? or this patch is
not suitable for applying?
Hmm... but I still want to try the last time: "please help check this
patch, when you have time".
And next, I should not send additional tracing mail again, that will be
really spa
Hello Maintainers:
Is this patch suitable for applying ? Does it belong to 'trivial' (or
'Documentation', or others) ?
And sorry for my original missing some important mail addresses when I
sent the original patch (I got them by "./scripts/get_maintainers", and
not give more considerations for
Hello all:
According to the reply of yours, it seems we need more 'work' for the
API related documents. If really it is, I need change my 'work' way
for it.
Currently, my 'work' way is "finding and solving issues", which may be
efficient for 'grow up' sub-systems (e.g. "kernel/" sub-system).
Bu
Hello Rob:
Maybe I misunderstand what you said (if so, I am sorry for it).
At least for me, what you said is valuable to get additional discussion,
but it seems better to start a new thread for it and also cc to
linux-doc mail list.
If so better include me in cc list, thanks. ;-)
If you think
On 08/07/2013 03:32 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 08/06/2013 12:31:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:46 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > "include/uapi/" is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important enough
>> > to get more global explanations by comments.
>>
>> It'd probably be usefu
On 08/06/2013 12:31:43 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:46 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> "include/uapi/" is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important
enough
> to get more global explanations by comments.
It'd probably be useful to have more descriptions
of uapi in the Documentati
On 08/07/2013 01:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:46 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> "include/uapi/" is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important enough
>> to get more global explanations by comments.
>
> It'd probably be useful to have more descriptions
> of uapi in the Documenta
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 09:46 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> "include/uapi/" is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important enough
> to get more global explanations by comments.
It'd probably be useful to have more descriptions
of uapi in the Documentation directory too.
--
To unsubscribe from this lis
"include/uapi/" is the whole Linux kernel API, it is important enough
to get more global explanations by comments.
In "include/uapi/Kbuild", "Makefile..." and "non-arch..." comments are
meaningless for current 'Kbuild', so delete them.
And add more explanations for "include/uapi/" in "include/uap
18 matches
Mail list logo
