Hi Axel,
On 一, 1月 01, 2018 at 08:38:50下午 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE makes
> regmap_write() call looks strange because it takes reg parameter fist
> then val.
> Base on Erick's suggestion to define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT and
>
Hi Axel,
On 一, 1月 01, 2018 at 08:38:50下午 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE makes
> regmap_write() call looks strange because it takes reg parameter fist
> then val.
> Base on Erick's suggestion to define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT and
>
The defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE makes
regmap_write() call looks strange because it takes reg parameter fist
then val.
Base on Erick's suggestion to define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT and
SC2731_WR_UNLOCK_VALUE instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
The defines for SC2731_WR_UNLOCK and SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT_VALUE makes
regmap_write() call looks strange because it takes reg parameter fist
then val.
Base on Erick's suggestion to define SC2731_PWR_WR_PROT and
SC2731_WR_UNLOCK_VALUE instead.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin
---
4 matches
Mail list logo