On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:30 PM Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:18:15 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:13:11PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > > When CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, all these tracepoints are defined as
> > > do-nothing macro.
> > > W
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:18:15 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:13:11PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > When CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, all these tracepoints are defined as
> > do-nothing macro.
> > We'd better make those inline functions that take proper arguments.
> >
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:13:11PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> When CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, all these tracepoints are defined as
> do-nothing macro.
> We'd better make those inline functions that take proper arguments.
>
> As RCU_TRACE() is defined as do-nothing marco as well when
> CONFIG_RC
Paul,
Are you OK with this patch? If you ack it, I'll pull it in through my
tree.
-- Steve
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 20:13:11 +0800
Yafang Shao wrote:
> When CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, all these tracepoints are defined as
> do-nothing macro.
> We'd better make those inline functions that take pro
When CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, all these tracepoints are defined as
do-nothing macro.
We'd better make those inline functions that take proper arguments.
As RCU_TRACE() is defined as do-nothing marco as well when
CONFIG_RCU_TRACE is not set, so we can clean it up.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao
-
5 matches
Mail list logo