On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>
>> @@ -571,9 +572,17 @@ void do_coredump(siginfo_t *siginfo)
>> goto fail_dropcount;
>> }
>>
>> - retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(helper_argv[0],
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>
> @@ -571,9 +572,17 @@ void do_coredump(siginfo_t *siginfo)
> goto fail_dropcount;
> }
>
> - retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(helper_argv[0], helper_argv,
> - NULL, UMH_WAIT_EXEC,
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
@@ -571,9 +572,17 @@ void do_coredump(siginfo_t *siginfo)
goto fail_dropcount;
}
- retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(helper_argv[0], helper_argv,
- NULL, UMH_WAIT_EXEC,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
@@ -571,9 +572,17 @@ void do_coredump(siginfo_t *siginfo)
goto fail_dropcount;
}
- retval = call_usermodehelper_fns(helper_argv[0],
These are the only users of call_usermodehelper_fns(). This function
suffers from not being able to determine if the cleanup is called. Even
if in this places the cleanup pointer is NULL, convert them to use the
separate call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec()
functions so we can
These are the only users of call_usermodehelper_fns(). This function
suffers from not being able to determine if the cleanup is called. Even
if in this places the cleanup pointer is NULL, convert them to use the
separate call_usermodehelper_setup() + call_usermodehelper_exec()
functions so we can
6 matches
Mail list logo