On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 04:40:23PM +1100, Brad Campbell wrote:
> On 10/11/20 3:55 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:04:04PM +1100, Brad Campbell wrote:
> >> On 9/11/20 3:06 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>> On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at
On 10/11/20 3:55 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:04:04PM +1100, Brad Campbell wrote:
>> On 9/11/20 3:06 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> On 202
On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:04:04PM +1100, Brad Campbell wrote:
> On 9/11/20 3:06 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> >>> Hi Brad,
> >>>
> >>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
> G'
On 9/11/20 3:06 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> Hi Brad,
>>>
>>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SM
On 10/11/20 4:08 am, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
>> Out of morbid curiosity I grabbed an older MacOS AppleSMC.kext (10.7) and
>> ran it through the disassembler.
>>
>> Every read/write to the SMC starts the same way with a check to make sure
>> the SMC is in a sane state. If it's not, a r
Hi Brad,
Out of morbid curiosity I grabbed an older MacOS AppleSMC.kext (10.7) and ran
it through the disassembler.
Every read/write to the SMC starts the same way with a check to make sure the
SMC is in a sane state. If it's not, a read command is sent to try and kick it
back into line :
Wa
On 8/11/20 11:04 pm, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> On 2020-11-08 12:57, Brad Campbell wrote:
>> On 8/11/20 9:14 pm, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Hi Brad,
On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
> G'day Henrik,
>
> I
On 9/11/20 7:44 pm, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:14:29 +0100
> Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> Hi Brad,
>>>
>>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened u
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:14:29 +0100
Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > Hi Brad,
> >
> > On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
> > > G'day Henrik,
> > >
> > > I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
> >
On 9/11/20 3:06 am, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>> Hi Brad,
>>>
>>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SM
On 11/8/20 2:14 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
>>> G'day Henrik,
>>>
>>> I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
>>> read_smc(). I assume
>>> tha
On 2020-11-08 12:57, Brad Campbell wrote:
On 8/11/20 9:14 pm, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Hi Brad,
On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
read_s
On 8/11/20 9:14 pm, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Brad,
>>
>> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
>>> G'day Henrik,
>>>
>>> I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
>>> read_smc(). I assume
>>> tha
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 09:35:28AM +0100, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Brad,
>
> On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
> > G'day Henrik,
> >
> > I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
> > read_smc(). I assume
> > that causes problems on the early Macbook. This
Hi Brad,
On 2020-11-08 02:00, Brad Campbell wrote:
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
read_smc(). I assume
that causes problems on the early Macbook. This is revised on the one sent
earlier.
If you could test this on your Air1,1 it'd be appre
G'day Henrik,
I noticed you'd also loosened up the requirement for SMC_STATUS_BUSY in
read_smc(). I assume
that causes problems on the early Macbook. This is revised on the one sent
earlier.
If you could test this on your Air1,1 it'd be appreciated.
Commit fff2d0f701e6 ("hwmon: (applesmc) avoi
16 matches
Mail list logo