On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:43:12PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:36:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:36:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > Register with kernel power-off handler
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >
> > > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> > > directly. Register with low priority to
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> > directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
> > only sets pm_power_off if it was not
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
> directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
> only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz
> Cc: Lee Jones
> Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Lee Jones
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
only sets pm_power_off if it was not already
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with low priority to reflect that
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:36:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:43:12PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 10:36:53AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz
Cc: Lee Jones
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
v3:
- Replace poweroff in all newly
Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off
directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code
only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set.
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sa...@linux.intel.com
Cc: Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
12 matches
Mail list logo