On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 01:00:09PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 06:49, Jarkko Sakkinen
> wrote:
> >
> > When TPM 2.0 trusted keys code was moved to the trusted keys subsystem,
> > the operations were unwrapped from tpm_try_get_ops() and tpm_put_ops(),
> > which
Hi Jarkko,
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 06:49, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
>
> When TPM 2.0 trusted keys code was moved to the trusted keys subsystem,
> the operations were unwrapped from tpm_try_get_ops() and tpm_put_ops(),
> which are used to take temporarily the ownership of the TPM chip. The
> ownership
When TPM 2.0 trusted keys code was moved to the trusted keys subsystem,
the operations were unwrapped from tpm_try_get_ops() and tpm_put_ops(),
which are used to take temporarily the ownership of the TPM chip. The
ownership is only taken inside tpm_send(), but this is not sufficient,
as in the key
3 matches
Mail list logo