Hi,
On 05/01/2016 at 16:31:38 +0800, Huang, Tao wrote :
> You and Alexandre are right. The rename is just make the driver more
> readable, i.e. let people know this driver suit for more PMIC no just
> rk808. In fact, I don't care the name is rk808 or rk8xx.
>
For this purpose, you can add the na
Hi, Alessandro:
On 2016年01月04日 21:59, Alessandro Zummo wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:45:46 +0100
> Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure it is useful to do that renaming. It is usual to have one
>> driver that supports multiple chips named with the forst chip it
>> supported.
>>
>> Also, w
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 10:45:46 +0100
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> I'm not sure it is useful to do that renaming. It is usual to have one
> driver that supports multiple chips named with the forst chip it
> supported.
>
> Also, what would happen if for example rk855 is not compatible at all
> with the
Hi,
On 31/12/2015 at 06:14:55 -0800, zhangqing wrote :
> make rtc-rk8xx.c compatible for all pmic chips.
> for pmic chips(rk808\rk807\rk816\rk818) in the future.
>
I'm not sure it is useful to do that renaming. It is usual to have one
driver that supports multiple chips named with the forst chip
Hi Zhang Qing,
On 12/31/2015 10:14 PM, zhangqing wrote:
make rtc-rk8xx.c compatible for all pmic chips.
for pmic chips(rk808\rk807\rk816\rk818) in the future.
The commit message will be better like this:
Rename the file to rtc-rk8xx.c to compatible other Rockchip PMIC chips
like rk807/rk816/rk8
make rtc-rk8xx.c compatible for all pmic chips.
for pmic chips(rk808\rk807\rk816\rk818) in the future.
Signed-off-by: zhangqing
---
drivers/mfd/rk808.c | 2 +-
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 8 +-
drivers/rtc/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/rtc
6 matches
Mail list logo