On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2017/6/4 23:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >
> > Cc'ed John Stultz
> >
> >> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
> >> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
> >> user or kernel?
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2017/6/4 23:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >
> > Cc'ed John Stultz
> >
> >> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
> >> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
> >> user or kernel?
On 2017/6/4 23:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>
> Cc'ed John Stultz
>
>> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
>> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
>> user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
>>
>>
On 2017/6/4 23:06, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>
> Cc'ed John Stultz
>
>> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
>> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
>> user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
>>
>>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
Cc'ed John Stultz
> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
> user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
>
>
> struct itimerval new_value;
> int ret;
>
>
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017, Xishi Qiu wrote:
Cc'ed John Stultz
> Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
> (signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
> user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
>
>
> struct itimerval new_value;
> int ret;
>
>
Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
(signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
struct itimerval new_value;
int ret;
new_value.it_interval.tv_sec = 140673496649799L;
new_value.it_interval.tv_usec =
Hi, this is the test case, and then I got ubsan error
(signed integer overflow) report, so the root cause is from
user or kernel? Shall we change something in timeval_valid()?
struct itimerval new_value;
int ret;
new_value.it_interval.tv_sec = 140673496649799L;
new_value.it_interval.tv_usec =
8 matches
Mail list logo