On 10/03/2016 15:01, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2016 07:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> For the next patch, we will want to filter PFERR_FETCH_MASK away early,
>> and not pass it to permission_fault if neither NX nor SMEP are enabled.
>> Prepare for the change.
>
> Why it is needed? I
On 03/08/2016 07:45 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
For the next patch, we will want to filter PFERR_FETCH_MASK away early,
and not pass it to permission_fault if neither NX nor SMEP are enabled.
Prepare for the change.
Why it is needed? It is much easier to drop PFEC.F in
update_permission_bitmask(
For the next patch, we will want to filter PFERR_FETCH_MASK away early,
and not pass it to permission_fault if neither NX nor SMEP are enabled.
Prepare for the change.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 26 +++---
3 matches
Mail list logo