On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:04:17AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:19 AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +02
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:19 AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wakees that were not migrated/norm
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yup, bugs--. Kinda funny, I considered ~this way first, but thought
> you'd not that approach.. dang, got it back-assward ;-)
Hehe, so the new flag is in a word we've already written to on this path
and it avoids growing the struc
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 18:13 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-05-23 17:40 GMT+08:00 Mike Galbraith :
> > On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
2016-05-23 17:40 GMT+08:00 Mike Galbraith :
> On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>
On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 11:19 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wakees that were not migrated/normali
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > Wakees that were not migrated/normalized eat an unwanted min_vruntime,
> > > and likely take a size XXL
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:36:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > sched/fair: Move se->vruntime normalization state into struct sched_entity
>
> Yeah, I used to have a patch like this; but for debugging. I don't
> particularly like carrying this information other than for verification
> bec
On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 11:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > >
> > > > Wakees that were not migrated/normali
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 09:00:01AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > > Wakees that were not migrated/normalized eat an unwanted min_vruntime,
> > > and likely take a size XXL
On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Wakees that were not migrated/normalized eat an unwanted min_vruntime,
> > and likely take a size XXL latency hit. Big box running master bled
> > profusely under heavy load u
11 matches
Mail list logo