On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 06:06:29PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Top ten authors:
>
> 61 v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Guilty as charged. Hopefully, this cycle it'll be better - I've just opened
vfs.git#for-next branch (more iov_iter stuff, for now). There's a couple
of trivial conflicts wit
As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
(No merge commits counted, next-20140331 was the last linux-next before
v3.14. I neglected to publish the stats for v3.14-rc1, but they are
mentioned below.)
Commits in v3.15-rc1 (relative to v3.14): 12034
Hi all,
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 09:18:18 +1000 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> The merge window is closed, so this would be a good moment for everyone
> to tidy up their linux-next included trees/branches (i.e. reset to
> v3.15-rc1) before continuing on. For most, this will be a simple fast
> forward .
The merge window is closed, so this would be a good moment for everyone
to tidy up their linux-next included trees/branches (i.e. reset to
v3.15-rc1) before continuing on. For most, this will be a simple fast
forward ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
pgp_
It's been two weeks since 3.14 was released, and -rc1 of 3.15 is now
tagged and pushed out, and the patches and tar-balls are going through
the compressors on kernel.org as I write this. Which means that the
merge window is closed, and people should send me fixes only.
And quite frankly, it's abou
5 matches
Mail list logo