Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, please don't down this legal rat hole. It would cause bullshit like
> people submitting dual licensed patches to the scheduler or GPL only
> patches to the ath5k or ACPI code.
Precisely. Signed-off-by means the patch author already authorized
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:00:09PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
> One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
> guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
>
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:00:09 -0400
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
> One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
> guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
>
Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
'Changes-licensed-under' (section 10).
Here I'll cover the new 'Changes-licensed-under' tag
Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
'Changes-licensed-under' (section 10).
Here I'll cover the new 'Changes-licensed-under' tag
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:00:09 -0400
Luis R. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 02:00:09PM -0400, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Our guidelines for patches [1] for Linux-wireless has been updated.
One section asks Linux-wireless developers to subscribe to the patch
guideline wiki page (section 2) and another which introduces the new
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, please don't down this legal rat hole. It would cause bullshit like
people submitting dual licensed patches to the scheduler or GPL only
patches to the ath5k or ACPI code.
Precisely. Signed-off-by means the patch author already authorized
the
8 matches
Mail list logo